tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6756434140794129886.post3969511990332603597..comments2008-01-24T04:26:37.406-08:00Brian Holtzhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18284822676116941984noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6756434140794129886.post-61218570990211950032008-01-24T04:26:00.000-08:002008-01-24T04:26:00.000-08:00I'm not sure why you think I'd necessarily be working on behalf of Restore '04 rather than the "Pure Principles" draft if I wasn't stuck on the WSPP.<BR/><BR/>I have a few problems with both proposals, but of the four things I object to in "Pure Principles," three are also part of the 2004 platform -- and I rather suspect that the fourth was included for the specific purpose of giving the convention delegates something to pat themselves on the back for amending out of it.<BR/><BR/>Your "smaller" platform is interesting, but it's also specifically geoist in appeal. I'm going for the big tent approach.<BR/><BR/>Best regards,<BR/>Tom KnappKn@ppsterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16271473384378782680noreply@blogger.com